PROCESSO DE PAZ NA COLÔMBIA E NA JUSTIÇA PENAL INTERNACIONAL
Palavras-chave:
acordo de paz na Colômbia, justiça criminal internacional, fins das penas, teoria absoluta ou da retribuição, prevenção geral negativaResumo
Oacordo final para acabar com o conflito na Colômbia estabeleceu sanções não-custodiadas, mesmo para os crimes mais graves, para aqueles que reconheceram sua responsabilidade. Assim, o problema é se tais sanções atendem ou não aos padrões da justiça criminal internacional. Uma vez analisados os objetivos da punição a nível nacional e internacional, evidencia-se que as sanções não custodiais não atendem aos padrões da justiça criminal internacional, onde a retribuição e a dissuasão são os principais propósitos de punição e a prisão é vista como a única maneira de alcançá-las. No entanto, a dinâmica do poder determinará o exercício da justiça criminal internacional no caso colombiano.
Downloads
Referências
Acuerdo General para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera. (2016) .http://www.altocomisionadoparalapaz.gov.co/procesos-y- conversaciones/Documentos%20compartidos/24-11-2016NuevoAcuerdoFinal.pdf.
Ambos, Kai. (2013). Treatise on International Criminal Law. Vol. I: Foundations and General Part, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bases de un acuerdo nacional de paz. (2016). http://static.iris.net.co/semana/upload/documents/bases-de-un-acuerdo-nacional-de- paz.pdf
Bensouda, Fatou. (2017). Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, on the conclusion of her visit to Colombia (10-13 September 2017). https://www.icc-cpi.int//Pages/item.aspx?name=170913-otp-stat-colombia
Boonin, David. (2008).The Problem of Punishment, New York, Cambridge University Press. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1993) Sentencia C-565.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1996) Sentencia C-261. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1996) Sentencia C-430. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1997) Sentencia C-144. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2000) Sentencia C-1112. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2002) Sentencia C-806. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2014) Sentencia C-370. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2014) Sentencia C-757. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016) Sentencia C-181. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016) Sentencia C-328.
Corte Penal Internacional, Oficina del Fiscal. (2016). Informe sobre las actividades de examen preliminar. Situación en Colombia. Recuperado de:https://www.icc- cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/161114-otp-rep-PE-Colombia.pdf.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal. (2001). M.P. Carlos E. Mejía Escobar, Proceso Núm. 18285, de 28 de noviembre de 2001.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal. (2017). M.P.Luis Antonio Hernández Barbosa, Proceso Núm. 46278, de 1 de junio de 2017.
Costa, Fausto. (1953). El delito y la pena en historia de la filosofía, México, Unión Tipográfica Editorial Hispano-Americana.
Cryer, Robert, Friman, Håkan, Robinson, Darryl & Wilmshurst, Elizabeth.(2010). An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. (2a ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dearing, Albin. (2017). Justice for Victims of Crime. Human Dignity as the Foundation of Criminal Justice in Europe, Cham, Springer.
Duff, Robert Alexander. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community, New York, Oxford University Press.
Fernández de Gurmendi, Silvia. (2017). Keynote address on the occasion of the Nuremberg Forum 2017 “10 years after the Nuremberg Declaration on Peace and Justice: „The Fight against Impunity at a Crossroad‟”. https://www.icc- cpi.int/itemsDocuments/171020-stat-pres.pdf
Golash, Deirdre. (2005).The Case against Punishment. Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law, New York, New York University Press.
Harhoff, Frederik. (2008). “Sense and Sensibility in Sentencing – Taking Stock of InternationalCriminal Punishment”, Law at War: The Law as it Was and the Law as it Should Be. Liber Amicorum Ove Bring, Leiden,MartinusNijhoff Publishers.
Hart,Herbert Lionel Adolphus y Gardner, John. (2008). Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law.(2a ed.),Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich.(1993).Fundamentos de la filosofía del derecho, Madrid, Libertarias-Prodhufi.
Honderich, Ted.(2006).Punishment. The Supposed Justifications Revisited, Londres, Pluto Press.
Hörnle, Tajtjana. (2015).Teorías de la pena, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Human Rights Watch. (2016). Colombia: Acuerdo de paz es una oportunidad histórica para reducir abusos. https://www.hrw.org/es/news/2016/08/25/colombia-acuerdo-de-paz-es- una-oportunidad-historica-para-reducir-abusos
Human Rights Watch. (2017).Análisis de Human Rights Watch sobre el Proyecto de Ley Estatutaria de la Administración de Justicia en la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz.
http://images.etn.eltiempo.digital/uploads/files/2017/10/09/2017_10_08%20Carta%20d e%20Human%20Rights%20Watch%20sobre%20Ley%20Estatutaria%20JEP.pdf
Jakobs, Günther. (1996). Sociedad, norma, persona en una teoría de un Derecho Penal funcional, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Jakobs, Günther. (1997).Derecho Penal, parte general. Fundamentos y teoría de la imputación.(2a ed.), Madrid, Marcial Pons.
Jakobs, Günther. (2002). Sobre la teoría de la pena(Trad. Manuel Cancio Meliá), Cuadernos de Conferencias y Articulos, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia–Centro de Investigación en Filosofía y Derecho, No. 16.
Lesch, Heiko. (1999).La función de la pena, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Los 10 duros dardos de Uribe a la firma de la paz. (26 de septiembre de 2016). Semana. http://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/declaraciones-de-alvaro-uribe-sobre-la-firma- de-la-paz-entre-el-gobierno-y-las-farc/495653
Merton, Robert King. (1968). Social theory and social structure, New York, The Free Press. Penas alternativas no gustan a todas las víctimas de las Farc. (24 de septiembre de 2015). El
Tiempo. http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-16385331
Proyecciones de población 2005-2020. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/poblacion/proyepobla06_20/8Tablasvida1 985_2020.pdf
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.(1998).International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/ea9aeff7-5752-4f84-be94- 0a655eb30e16/0/rome_statute_english.pdf
Ross, Alf.(1975).On Guilt, Responsability and Punishment, Berkeley & Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Roxin, Claus. (1997). Derecho Penal. Parte general, T. I (Trad. Diego Manuel Luzón Peña, Miguel Díaz y García Conlledo& Javier de Vicente Remesal), Madrid, Civitas.
Roxin, Claus. (2016). La teoría del delito en la discusión actual, T. I (Trad.Manuel A. Abanto Vásquez), Lima, Grijley.
Silva Sánchez, Jesús María. (2008). “¿Nullum crimen sine poena? Sobre las doctrinas penales de la „lucha contra la impunidad‟ y del „derecho de la víctima al castigo del autor‟”,Derecho Penal del siglo XXI,Madrid, Consejo General del Poder Judicial.
Silva García, Germán. (2013).Criminología. Teoría sociológica del delito.(2ª ed.), Bogotá, InstitutoLatinoamericano de Altos Estudios.
The International Criminal Court and Its 'Small Fry Justice'. (2013).Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 48, No. 34.
The Prosecutor V. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo.No.: ICC-01/05-01/08. Decision on Sentence.
International Criminal Court. 2016.
The Prosecutor V. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gomboet al.No.: ICC-01/05-01/13. Decision on Sentence. International Criminal Court. 2017.
The Prosecutor V. ZejnilDelalicet al. No.: IT-96-21-A. Appeal judgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991.2001.
The Prosecutor V. DraženErdemović. No.: IT-96-22-Tbis. SentencingJudgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991. 1998.
The Prosecutor V. Jean Kambanda. No.: ICTR 97-23-S. Judgement and sentence. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. 1998.
The Prosecutor V. Feidinand Nahimanaet al.No.: ICTR-99-51-T. Judgement and sentence.
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. 2003.
The Prosecutor V. Feidinand Nahimana et al. No.: ICTR-99-52-A. Judgement. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. 2007.
The Prosecutor V. MomirNikolić. No.: IT-02-60/1-S. Sentencing judgement. International Tribunal for theProsecution of PersonsResponsible for Serious Violations ofInternational Humanitarian LawCommitted in the Territory ofFormer Yugoslavia since 1991.2003.
The Prosecutor V. Biljana Plavšić. No.: IT-00-39&40/1-S. Sentencing Judgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991. 2003.
The Prosecutor V. MilomirStakić. No.: IT-97-24-T. Judgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991.2003.
The Prosecutor V. MilomirStakić. No.: IT-97-24-A. Appeal judgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991.2006.
The Prosecutor V.StevanTodorovic. No.: IT-95-9/1-S. Sentencing judgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991. 2001.
Velandia-Montes, Rafael. (2015a). La punitividad electoral en las políticas penales contemporáneas, T. I, Bogotá, Instituto Latinoamericano de Altos Estudios.
Velandia-Montes, Rafael.(2015b). La punitividad electoral en las políticas penales contemporáneas, T. II, Bogotá, Instituto Latinoamericano de Altos Estudios.
Velandia-Montes, Rafael et al. (2018). Los sí delincuentes: visiones sociales sobre la pena, la criminalidad y el sistema penal,Bogotá, Instituto Latinoamericano de Altos Estudios.
Vold, George Bryan. (1998). Theoretical Criminology.(4a ed.), New York, Oxford University Press.
Welzel, Hans. (1964).El nuevo sistema del Derecho Penal, Barcelona, Ariel.
Welzel, Hans.(1977). Derecho Penal alemán. (11a ed., 4a ed. Castellana), Santiago de Chile, Jurídica de Chile.
Wringe, Bill. (2016). An Expressive Theory of Punishment, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Zaffaroni, Eugenio Raúl, Alagia, Alejandro & Slokar, Alejandro. (2000).Derecho Penal, parte general, Buenos Aires, Ediar.
